🔗 Share this article

During a promotional clip for Simon Cowell's upcoming Netflix series, one finds a moment that appears almost touching in its commitment to past times. Perched on an assortment of beige couches and stiffly clutching his legs, the executive talks about his goal to curate a fresh boyband, twenty years after his first TV talent show aired. "It represents a huge danger in this," he states, heavy with solemnity. "Should this fails, it will be: 'The mogul has lost it.'" Yet, for observers aware of the declining audience figures for his long-running shows recognizes, the expected reaction from a vast majority of modern young adults might simply be, "Simon who?"

The Central Question: Can a Television Figure Pivot to a Changed Landscape?

That is not to say a younger audience of viewers won't be lured by Cowell's track record. The question of if the sixty-six-year-old mogul can tweak a dusty and age-old formula is less about current musical tastes—a good thing, since the music industry has increasingly moved from TV to apps including TikTok, which Cowell has stated he dislikes—and more to do with his remarkably time-tested skill to produce good television and mold his public image to suit the era.

In the publicity push for the project, the star has attempted expressing contrition for how rude he was to participants, expressing apology in a major outlet for "his mean persona," and ascribing his eye-rolling demeanor as a judge to the tedium of audition days instead of what many interpreted it as: the harvesting of entertainment from confused aspirants.

History Repeats

Anyway, we've heard this before; The executive has been making these sorts of noises after facing pressure from reporters for a good 15 years now. He expressed them previously in the year 2011, in an meeting at his leased property in the Beverly Hills, a place of minimalist decor and sparse furnishings. There, he described his life from the viewpoint of a passive observer. It seemed, at the time, as if he viewed his own personality as subject to free-market principles over which he had no particular control—internal conflicts in which, inevitably, occasionally the baser ones prospered. Whatever the consequence, it was accompanied by a resigned acceptance and a "It is what it is."

This is a babyish dodge typical of those who, having done immense wealth, feel little need to explain themselves. Still, some hold a fondness for Cowell, who combines US-style hustle with a distinctly and fascinatingly odd duck personality that can really only be UK in origin. "I'm a weird person," he remarked during that period. "Truly." The pointy shoes, the idiosyncratic wardrobe, the ungainly physicality; these traits, in the setting of Hollywood conformity, can appear rather charming. It only took a look at the lifeless home to ponder the difficulties of that specific interior life. While he's a challenging person to work with—and one imagines he can be—when he speaks of his willingness to everyone in his orbit, from the doorman to the top, to bring him with a winning proposal, one believes.

'The Next Act': An Older Simon and Gen Z Contestants

'The Next Act' will present an more mature, kinder version of Cowell, if because he has genuinely changed now or because the market requires it, who knows—however this shift is hinted at in the show by the presence of his longtime partner and fleeting shots of their eleven-year-old son, Eric. And while he will, probably, hold back on all his trademark theatrical put-downs, viewers may be more interested about the hopefuls. Specifically: what the gen Z or even gen Alpha boys competing for the judge perceive their roles in the series to be.

"I remember a contestant," he stated, "who burst out on to the microphone and literally yelled, 'I've got cancer!' Treating it as a winning ticket. He was so elated that he had a sad story."

In their heyday, his programs were an initial blueprint to the now prevalent idea of mining your life for screen time. What's changed these days is that even if the aspirants vying on the series make similar calculations, their online profiles alone mean they will have a larger ownership stake over their own personal brands than their predecessors of the 2000s era. The more pressing issue is if he can get a face that, similar to a noted journalist's, seems in its default expression instinctively to convey incredulity, to display something more inviting and more friendly, as the current moment demands. And there it is—the reason to watch the first episode.